From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810137F37 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:04:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F55AC002 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:04:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id snGoJPPM4RMheRGd for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:04:14 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: definitions for /proc/fs/xfs/stat Message-ID: <20130615020414.GB29338@dastard> References: <91017249.1356192.1371248207334.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <504625587.1365681.1371255450937.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Seger Cc: Nathan Scott , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:55:17PM -0400, Mark Seger wrote: > I'm doing 1 second samples and the rates are very steady. The reason I > ended up at this level of testing was I had done a sustained test for 2 > minutes at about 5MB/sec and was seeing over 500MB/sec going to the disk, > again sampling at 1-second intervals. I'd be happy to provide detailed > output and can even sample more frequently if you like. Where are you getting your IO throughput numbers from? How do they compare to, say, the output of `iostat -d -x -m 1`? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs