From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442F429DF8 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:53:54 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:53:53 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: return FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNKNOWN for delayed allocation extent Message-ID: <20130617215353.GF20932@sgi.com> References: <51B08D71.7090404@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51B08D71.7090404@oracle.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jeff Liu Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hey Jeff, On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 06:24:01AM -0700, Jeff Liu wrote: > From: Jie Liu > > For FIEMAP ioctl(2), if an extent is in delayed allocation > state, we need to return the FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNKNOWN flag except > the FIEMAP_EXTENT_DELALLOC because its data location is unknown. > > Signed-off-by: Jie Liu Looks fine. Is there an email thread I can reference? Reviewed-by: Ben Myers Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs