From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824877CBF for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:51:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F1A304032 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kZNEaworMOEH4ENz for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:51:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:51:35 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/60] xfs: patch queue for 3.11 Message-ID: <20130620045135.GP29376@dastard> References: <1371617468-32559-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20130619143537.GN20932@sgi.com> <20130619225404.GJ29338@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130619225404.GJ29338@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:54:04AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 09:35:37AM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > Dave, > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 02:50:08PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > This is my patch queue for 3.11 as it stands right now. > > > > Getting all of this in for 3.11 does not strike me as being > > realistic. > > Why not? We've done more complex changes in the past... > > > You need to think about how this can be split up. > > Sure - the first 27 patches at the necessary ones for 3.11. Actaully if you really concerned about how little time you have left before the next merge window opens, then just concentrate on the first 13 patches (i.e. up to the local format fork extent handling change for xfs_write_bmapi). I'm about to rework the series based on the log_format/da_format/format split that I suggested in reponse to Christoph's comments and also to avoid creating xfs_inode_ops.[ch]. If I get that done this afternoon, I'll repost it all for you.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs