From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9224C7F37 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:18:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA06304053 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id BB18IzjE9ykv6lo8 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:17:53 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/60] xfs: patch queue for 3.11 Message-ID: <20130620091753.GA13353@infradead.org> References: <1371617468-32559-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20130619091538.GA359@infradead.org> <20130619213417.GI29338@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130619213417.GI29338@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 07:34:17AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > I don't see any problem with doing that, though I would like to keep > some of it separate - the dir2 stuff is complex enough that I would > like to keep it separate, but stuff like all the log item format > headers can be aggregated. > > How about we end up with xfs_log_format.h for the log and log item > formats, xfs_da_format.h for all the dir2/da/attr format definitions, > and xfs_format.h for everything else? Sounds reasonable. > > - any chance to reorder the inode.c split so that stuff doesn't get > > move around multiple times? > > I was waiting for that question - I have been considering doing that > but I've been putting it off because it is a fair bit of shuffling > that I'd have to do from scratch. Sounds like another vote for :redo > it"... Maybe wait for the discussion about having the trans stuff and the separate project quotas to go in before this, as it would mean another big redo.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs