public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: lseek SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE consolidation
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:13:20 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130623231320.GC29376@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C454DE.2010008@oracle.com>

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 09:27:58PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> From: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
> 
> Consolidate lseek(2) SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE according to the
> implementation of VFS lseek_execute():
> - if end up with a negative offset, return EINVAL if file
>   is not huge.
> - if end up with an offset larger than s_maxbytes, return
>   EINVAL as well.
> - reset file version to 0 if end up with an offset that is
>   not equal to the current file offset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
> 
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index a5f2042..dc42751 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -1270,8 +1270,19 @@ xfs_seek_data(
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> -	if (offset != file->f_pos)
> +	if (offset < 0 && !(file->f_mode & FMODE_UNSIGNED_OFFSET)) {
> +		error = EINVAL;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
> +	if (offset > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes) {
> +		error = EINVAL;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (offset != file->f_pos) {
>  		file->f_pos = offset;
> +		file->f_version = 0;
> +	}

Hi Jeff, why are you copy-n-pasting this code from lseek_execute()
rather than making lseek_execute() an exported function and calling
that directly? 

>  
>  out_unlock:
>  	xfs_iunlock_map_shared(ip, lock);
> @@ -1372,6 +1383,15 @@ xfs_seek_hole(
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> +	if (offset < 0 && !(file->f_mode & FMODE_UNSIGNED_OFFSET)) {
> +		error = EINVAL;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
> +	if (offset > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes) {
> +		error = EINVAL;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}

These checks belong after we truncated offset to isize, don't they?
And that would make both of these functions simply require a call to
lseek_execute(), yes?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-23 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-21 13:27 [PATCH] xfs: lseek SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE consolidation Jeff Liu
2013-06-23 23:13 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-06-24  3:28   ` Jeff Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130623231320.GC29376@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox