From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748407F3F for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:48:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:48:14 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] xfs: update mount options documentation Message-ID: <20130627144814.GM20932@sgi.com> References: <1372313099-8121-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1372313099-8121-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1372313099-8121-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:04:45PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Because it's horribly out of date. > > And mark various deprecated options as deprecated and give them a > removal date. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely Regarding removal of these mount options and sysctls: initially these all look pretty reasonable but we need to be very careful here. I've read some discussions on lkml that seem to suggest that such interfaces which have been exported to userspace shouldn't be removed at all. Not that I want to keep around a bunch of worn out interfaces... Applied. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs