From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Cc: sandeen@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: use xfs_io fiemap instead of filefrag V2
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 13:01:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130708180146.GG20932@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130626021943.GE29376@dastard>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:19:43PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:21:36AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Btrfs has always failed shared/218 because of the way we allocate extents on
> > disk. The last part of 218 writes contiguously holey from the start of the file
> > forward, which for btrfs means we get 16 extents but they are physically
> > contigous. filefrag -v shows all 16 extents, but prints out that there is 1
> > extent, because they are physically contiguous. This isn't quite right and
> > makes the test fail. So instead of using filefrag use xfs_io -c fiemap which
> > will print the whole map and then get the count from there. With this patch
> > btrfs now passes the test, I also verified that ext4 and xfs still pass this
> > test. Thanks,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> > ---
> > V1->V2: change _require_defrag to check for xfs_io having fiemap support as per
> > Eric's suggestion.
> >
> > common/defrag | 6 +++---
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/defrag b/common/defrag
> > index f04fd42..a4bc976 100644
> > --- a/common/defrag
> > +++ b/common/defrag
> > @@ -38,13 +38,13 @@ _require_defrag()
> > esac
> >
> > _require_command $DEFRAG_PROG
> > - _require_command $FILEFRAG_PROG
> > + _require_xfs_io_fiemap
> > }
> >
> > _extent_count()
> > {
> > - $FILEFRAG_PROG $1 | awk '{print $2}'
> > - $FILEFRAG_PROG -v $1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap" $1 | tail -n +2 | grep -v hole | wc -l
> > + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap" $1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>
> Looks good, but you can do that with a single fiemap execution:
>
> $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap" $1 | tee -a $seqres.full |\
> | tail -n +2 | grep -v hole | wc -l
>
> Still good either way
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Applied.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-08 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-24 14:21 [PATCH] xfstests: use xfs_io fiemap instead of filefrag V2 Josef Bacik
2013-06-26 2:19 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-08 18:01 ` Ben Myers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130708180146.GG20932@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox