From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E0C7F51 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:30:05 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:30:01 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: make fs for 274 larger Message-ID: <20130708213001.GJ20932@sgi.com> References: <1371846670-21882-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1371846670-21882-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Josef Bacik Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:31:10PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > Btrfs will default to mixed block groups for 1 gigabyte file systems and > smaller, which means data and metadata share the same area. This makes > generic/274 fail for us because we cannot reserve enough metadata space to do > our writes. Bumping the scratch fs up to 2 gigabytes allows us to do our normal > metadata/data seperation and allows us to pass this test. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik XFS and ext4 still passed with this patch. Reviewed-by: Ben Myers _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs