From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Corruption of root fs during git bisect of drm system hang
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:07:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130712070721.GA359@x4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130712021737.GA5228@dastard>
On 2013.07.12 at 12:17 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:07:55AM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2013.07.10 at 23:12 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > > On 7/10/2013 10:58 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 05:36:21AM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > >
> > > >> I was loosing my KDE settings bit by bit with every reboot during the
> > > >> bisection. First my window-rules disappeared, then my desktop background
> > > >> changed to default, then my taskbar moved from top to the bottom, etc.
> > > >> In the end I had to restore all my .files from backup.
> > > >
> > > > That's not filesystem corruption. That sounds more like someone not
> > > > using fsync in the apropriate place when overwriting a file....
> > >
> > > From Sandeen's blog, March 2009:
> > >
> > > "I dunno how to resolve this right now. I talked to some nice KDE folks
> > > on irc; they basically want atomic writes, either you get your old file
> > > or your new file post-crash; and tempfile/sync/rename does this – but
> > > the fsync hurts on 78% of the Linux filesystems out there. So their
> > > KSaveFile class doesn’t fsync. So what to do, what to do.."
> > >
> > > That's 4 years ago. Is it possible the KDE devs are still not using
> > > fsync? Sure seems likely given Markus' problem.
> >
> > Looking at the source:
> > http://api.kde.org/4.10-api/kdelibs-apidocs/kdecore/html/ksavefile_8cpp_source.html#l00219
> > it appears that one can set an environment variable KDE_EXTRA_FSYNC to
> > address this issue.
> >
> > However in my case it doesn't help. Even with KDE_EXTRA_FSYNC=1 I still
> > loose my KDE settings in case of a crash. So the whole fsync thing might
> > be a red herring.
> >
> > What's more this time I endend up with undeletable files in /tmp (for
> > example .X0-lock) after the crash:
> >
> > (/dev/sdb was mounted and unmounted normally before I ran xfs_repair)
> >
> > t@ubunt:~# xfs_repair /dev/sdb
> > Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
> > Phase 2 - using internal log
> > - zero log...
> > - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
> > agi unlinked bucket 0 is 683435008 in ag 2 (inode=4978402304)
> > agi unlinked bucket 1 is 683435009 in ag 2 (inode=4978402305)
> > - found root inode chunk
>
> Again, these are signs that log recovery has not completed
> successfully or that for some reason it thought the log was clean.
> Can you please post the dmesg output after the crash when you go
> through the mount/unmount process before you run xfs_repair?
Sure.
First boot after crash:
XFS (sdb2): Mounting Filesystem
XFS (sdb2): Starting recovery (logdev: internal)
XFS (sdb2): Ending recovery (logdev: internal)
Second boot after crash:
XFS (sdb2): Mounting Filesystem
XFS (sdb2): Ending clean mount
I then boot Ubuntu from another disc to run xfs_repair.
And looking through my logs I see this WARNING:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 439 at fs/inode.c:280 drop_nlink+0x33/0x40()
CPU: 0 PID: 439 Comm: gconfd-2 Not tainted 3.10.0-08982-g6d128e1-dirty #42
Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M4A78T-E, BIOS 3503 04/13/2011
0000000000000009 ffffffff8157d030 0000000000000000 ffffffff81060788
ffff8801f8608cc8 ffff880205998230 ffff8801f7bede58 0000000000000000
ffff8801f86083c0 ffffffff8110ce93 ffff8801f8608b40 ffffffff811b7104
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8157d030>] ? dump_stack+0x41/0x51
[<ffffffff81060788>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x68/0x80
[<ffffffff8110ce93>] ? drop_nlink+0x33/0x40
[<ffffffff811b7104>] ? xfs_droplink+0x24/0x60
[<ffffffff811b84ed>] ? xfs_remove+0x24d/0x380
[<ffffffff811b1657>] ? xfs_vn_unlink+0x37/0x80
[<ffffffff8110414e>] ? vfs_unlink+0x6e/0xe0
[<ffffffff8110432a>] ? do_unlinkat+0x16a/0x220
[<ffffffff810f4fa9>] ? SyS_faccessat+0x149/0x200
[<ffffffff81583292>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
---[ end trace de5865b7c20ab8e4 ]---
--
Markus
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-12 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-10 9:06 Corruption of root fs during git bisect of drm system hang Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-11 0:31 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-11 3:36 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-11 3:58 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-11 4:12 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-11 9:07 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-11 11:28 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-11 20:24 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-11 20:40 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-11 23:01 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-12 2:38 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-12 2:17 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-12 7:07 ` Markus Trippelsdorf [this message]
2013-07-13 9:05 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-15 2:28 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-15 6:47 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-19 12:22 ` [Bisected] " Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-19 12:41 ` Stefan Ring
2013-07-19 12:51 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-19 16:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-19 16:32 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-19 19:13 ` Ben Myers
2013-07-19 19:56 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-19 20:28 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-19 19:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-19 19:53 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-19 21:11 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-07-20 3:18 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-20 17:21 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-07-21 7:37 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-20 1:48 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-22 10:22 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-22 10:47 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-22 22:54 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-11 4:15 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-07-11 0:37 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-11 3:47 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130712070721.GA359@x4 \
--to=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox