From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7226E7F37 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:58:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DEF304051 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id UOoOhX5MmV5tGhrg for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:58:00 -0400 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: XFS: Assertion failed: xfs_dir2_sf_lookup(args) == ENOENT, file: fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c, line: 358 Message-ID: <20130715195800.GD1706@redhat.com> References: <20130712023930.GA6473@redhat.com> <20130713020030.GG3438@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130713020030.GG3438@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Linux Kernel , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:00:30PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > [ 97.162665] XFS: Assertion failed: xfs_dir2_sf_lookup(args) == ENOENT, file: fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c, line: 358 > .... > > So, it's not clear what has caused this yet. Is it reproducable? Just hit it again on the same machine. > would be good to get a trace of lookup vs addname events from XFS, > too (i.e. all the xfs_dir* and xfs_da* events) so we can see if the > correct lookups were done prior to the failing addname operation... <- xfs tracing noob. Got a recipe I can cut-n-paste ? Or a patch if that's necessary.. Dave _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs