From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67ABF7F53 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 18:32:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA90AC004 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id UTsKdQxTgXnHqbXz for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:32:40 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/49] xfsprogs: patches for crc-dev branch Message-ID: <20130722233240.GC19986@dastard> References: <1374216324-8781-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <51EB80DB.80602@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51EB80DB.80602@gmail.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Michael L. Semon" Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 02:34:03AM -0400, Michael L. Semon wrote: > On 07/19/2013 02:44 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > Comments, thoughts, flames? > > I was hoping that I could use this 3.12 patchset with a 3.11.0-rc > kernel, but the xfstests look like a disaster by going that way. We'll, if you don't have all the filtering patches that I posted a while back it'll make quite a mess with all the experimental warnings mkfs and repair emit, and the xfs_db tests that modify filesystem structures will all also fail... I'll repost them later today... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs