public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Cc: linxu-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: exit out if _scratch_mount fails
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:33:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130726163352.GL1681@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F2A091.3010407@sandeen.net>

Josef, Eric,

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:15:13AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 7/26/13 11:12 AM, Ben Myers wrote:
> > Hey Josef,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:07:27PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> >> I test some of the different mkfs options for btrfs, one set doesn't work
> >> properly with small file systems, so the fs won't mount.  This is fine from a
> >> btrfs point of view, but tests that fail to mount the scratch fs will run
> >> anyway, so if it's a "fill the fs" sort of test this will wreak havoc.  To fix
> >> this just error out of _scratch_mount fails.  Thanks,
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> > 
> > I noticed that this change causes dmapi tests to try to be run on systems that
> > don't have dmapi supported, and they fail.  Have you seen this?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 	Ben
> 
> I haven't tested either way, but does:
> 
>      _mount -t $FSTYP `_scratch_mount_options $*` || _fail "Scratch mount failed"
> 
> work any better?

This still fails like so:

xfs/142  [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests/results/xfs/142.out.bad)
--- tests/xfs/142.out       2013-05-17 14:23:16.000000000 -0500
+++ /root/xfstests/results/xfs/142.out.bad  2013-07-26 11:31:00.128200302 -0500
@@ -1,232 +1,8 @@
QA output created by 142
-Attribute tests beginning...
-Report: success with set #0.
-Report: success with set #1.
-Report: success with set #2.
-Report: success with set #3.
-Report: success with set #4.
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/142.out /root/xfstests/results/xfs/142.out.bad' to see the entire diff)

Thanks,
	Ben

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-26 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-09 19:07 [PATCH] xfstests: exit out if _scratch_mount fails Josef Bacik
2013-07-19 20:38 ` Ben Myers
2013-07-26 16:12 ` Ben Myers
2013-07-26 16:15   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-26 16:25     ` Josef Bacik
2013-07-26 16:33     ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-07-26 16:58       ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130726163352.GL1681@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linxu-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox