From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Jason Rosenberg <jbr@squareup.com>
Cc: stan@hardwarefreak.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: understanding speculative preallocation
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:42:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130726214238.GM1681@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA+BczTt-ZN7DU8gpWAY0SdL0KWL2Z_y8qKvmxMn7b+T9frK4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jason,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:11:55PM -0400, Jason Rosenberg wrote:
> Is it safe to say that speculative preallocation will not be used if a file
> is opened read-only?
The blocks will only be reserved on an appending write.
> It turns out that the kafka server does indeed write lots of log files, and
> rotate them after they reach a max size, but never closes the files until
> the app exits, or until it deletes the files. This is because it needs to
> make them available for reading, etc. So, an obvious change for kafka
> might be to close each log file after rotating, and then re-open it
> read-only for consumers of the data. Does that sound like a solution that
> would pro-actively release pre-allocated storage?
An interesting idea, and I'm not quite sure. The blocks past EOF are freed in
xfs_release on close in some circumstances, and it looks like you have a chance
to call xfs_free_eofblocks (at least in the most uptodate codebase) if you did
not use explicit preallocation (e.g. fallocate or an xfs ioctl) and did not
open it append-only. You could reopen with read-write flags and it wouldn't
make a difference vs read-only, so long as you don't do an appending write.
Seems like it's worth a try. Another possibility is to look into what would
happen if you do a truncate up to i_size when you're ready to stop appending to
the file. I haven't checked that out though.
Regards,
Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-26 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 7:23 understanding speculative preallocation jbr
2013-07-26 11:50 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-26 17:40 ` Jason Rosenberg
2013-07-26 19:27 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-26 19:43 ` A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation) Jay Ashworth
2013-07-27 3:52 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-27 21:00 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-28 1:38 ` aurfalien
2013-07-28 1:50 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-28 2:08 ` aurfalien
2013-07-28 2:21 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-28 5:09 ` Purpose of the XFS list -- was: " Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-28 15:45 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-08-14 17:01 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-07-28 7:18 ` Stefan Ring
2013-07-28 15:48 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 0:02 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-29 0:06 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 2:41 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-29 3:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-29 4:11 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-29 14:33 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 15:25 ` Dave Howorth
2013-07-29 3:38 ` Keith Keller
2013-07-29 4:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-29 4:57 ` Keith Keller
2013-07-29 13:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-29 18:15 ` Keith Keller
2013-07-29 14:24 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 14:36 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 14:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-29 15:30 ` Jay Ashworth
2013-07-29 17:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-29 0:00 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-28 5:15 ` Michael L. Semon
2013-07-26 20:38 ` understanding speculative preallocation Jason Rosenberg
2013-07-26 20:50 ` Ben Myers
2013-07-26 21:04 ` Jason Rosenberg
2013-07-26 21:11 ` Jason Rosenberg
2013-07-26 21:42 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-07-27 1:30 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-28 2:19 ` Jason Rosenberg
2013-07-29 0:04 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-26 21:45 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-07-27 4:26 ` Keith Keller
2013-07-27 1:26 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-26 7:35 jbr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130726214238.GM1681@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=jbr@squareup.com \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox