From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E1A7F37 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:50:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BEEAC001 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:50:24 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/49] xfs: split out inode log item format definition Message-ID: <20130801085024.GA13494@infradead.org> References: <1374215120-7271-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1374215120-7271-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <51F7E7BF.6020108@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51F7E7BF.6020108@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Tinguely Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com > >+} xfs_icdinode_t; > > > A log header file does not strike me as the place for the internal > representation of the on disk inode structure. It's not not really the in-core version, I just messed up the name when doing the proper endianess annotations for XFS many years ago. The correct name would be xfs_log_inode or similar. Maybe the comments should get a little update. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs