From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCE67CBF for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 17:28:12 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 17:28:11 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] xfs: don't emit v5 superblock warnings on write Message-ID: <20130805222811.GI3111@sgi.com> References: <1370564771-4929-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1370607901-11538-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1370607901-11538-13-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1370607901-11538-13-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:25:01PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > We write the superblock every 30s or so which results in the > verifier being called. Right now that results in this output > every 30s: > > XFS (vda): Version 5 superblock detected. This kernel has EXPERIMENTAL support enabled! > Use of these features in this kernel is at your own risk! > > And spamming the logs. > > We don't need to check for whether we support v5 superblocks or > whether there are feature bits we don't support set as these are > only relevant when we first mount the filesytem. i.e. on superblock > read. Hence for the write verification we can just skip all the > checks (and hence verbose output) altogether. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Goes with commit 34510185abeaa5be9b178a41c0a03d30aec3db7e Reviewed-by: Ben Myers _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs