From: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250)
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:24:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130821152458.GD986@poseidon.cudanet.local> (raw)
We've started experimenting with larger directory block sizes to avoid
directory fragmentation. Everything seems to work fine, except that the log
is spammed with these lovely debug messages:
XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250)
>From looking at the code, it looks like that each of those messages (there
are thousands) equates to 100 trips through the loop. My guess is that the
larger blocks require multi-page allocations which are harder to satisfy.
This is with 3.10 kernel.
The hardware is something like (I can find out the exact config is you want):
32 cores
128 GB RAM
LSI 9271-8i RAID (one big RAID-60 with 36 disks, partitioned)
As I hinted at earlier, we end up with pretty big directories. We can
semi-reliably trigger this when we run rsync on the data between two
(identical) hosts over 10GbitE.
# xfs_info /dev/sda9
meta-data=/dev/sda9 isize=256 agcount=6, agsize=268435455 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=1454213211, imaxpct=5
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=65536 ascii-ci=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=521728, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
/proc/slabinfo: https://www.copy.com/s/1x1yZFjYO2EI/slab.txt
sysrq m output: https://www.copy.com/s/mYfMYfJJl2EB/sysrq-m.txt
While I realize that the message isn't bad, it does mean that the system is
having hard time allocating memory. This could potentially lead to bad
performance, or even an actual deadlock. Do you have any suggestions?
Thanks,
Jeff.
--
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress
depends on the unreasonable man.
- George Bernard Shaw
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-21 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-21 15:24 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [this message]
2013-08-22 2:25 ` XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250) Dave Chinner
2013-08-22 15:07 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-28 9:13 Emmanuel Lacour
2013-11-28 10:05 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-03 9:53 ` Emmanuel Lacour
2013-12-03 12:50 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-03 16:28 ` Yann Dupont
2013-12-09 9:47 ` Emmanuel Lacour
2013-12-11 20:22 ` Ben Myers
2013-12-11 23:53 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130821152458.GD986@poseidon.cudanet.local \
--to=jeffpc@josefsipek.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox