From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE61829DFB for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:11:50 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:11:46 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix wrong flag ASSERT in xfs_attr_shortform_getvalue Message-ID: <20130823201146.GW5262@sgi.com> References: <4F75DE2B.7030807@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F75DE2B.7030807@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss Hey Eric, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:24:11AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > This ASSERT is testing an if_flags flag value against > a di_aformat enum value. di_aformat is never assigned > XFS_IFINLINE. > > This happens to work for now, because XFS_IFINLINE has > the same value as XFS_DINODE_FMT_LOCAL, and that's tested > just before we call this function. > > However, I think the intention is to assert that we have > read in the data, i.e. XFS_IFINLINE on if_flags, before > we use if_data. This is done in other places through the > code as well. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Looks like this one fell through the cracks. You still interested in merging it? Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs