From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: potential argument order bug in fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_node.c:xfs_dir2_leafn_unbalance
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 22:38:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130905023818.GA10694@redhat.com> (raw)
I'm picking through some of the bugs in coverity's database,
and I came across this one, which I'm unsure of..
In xfs_dir2_leafn_unbalance we have this code..
1583 if (xfs_dir2_leafn_order(save_blk->bp, drop_blk->bp))
1584 xfs_dir3_leafn_moveents(args, drop_blk->bp, &drophdr, dents, 0,
1585 save_blk->bp, &savehdr, sents, 0,
1586 drophdr.count);
1587 else
1588 xfs_dir3_leafn_moveents(args, drop_blk->bp, &drophdr, dents, 0,
1589 save_blk->bp, &savehdr, sents,
1590 savehdr.count, drophdr.count);
The issue that coverity picked up in both cases, is that 'sents' and 'dents' are in
a different order to how the xfs_dir3_leafn_moveents function expects them.
Is this intentional ? If so I'll mark it as such in their db.
thanks,
Dave
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2013-09-05 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-05 2:38 Dave Jones [this message]
2013-09-05 3:11 ` potential argument order bug in fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_node.c:xfs_dir2_leafn_unbalance Dave Chinner
2013-09-05 3:24 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130905023818.GA10694@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox