From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE18C7F55
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon,  9 Sep 2013 08:32:59 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11])
	by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA96AC004
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon,  9 Sep 2013 06:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9])
	by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id tftvMEUqO1ArBo0H (version=TLSv1
	cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Mon, 09 Sep 2013 06:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:32:54 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: increase inode cluster size for v5 filesystems
Message-ID: <20130909133254.GA14778@infradead.org>
References: <1378715664-19969-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1378715664-19969-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

I can't see anything v5 format specific here, as 512 byte inodes can be
created with v4 filesystems as well.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs