public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: increase inode cluster size for v5 filesystems
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 01:35:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130909153546.GT12779@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130909133254.GA14778@infradead.org>

On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:32:54AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I can't see anything v5 format specific here, as 512 byte inodes can be
> created with v4 filesystems as well.

It's an RFC, and so i've just done the minimum I need to do to
verify it is working corectly. Indeed, I'm not sure it is all there
yet, as I haven't tested increased inode alignments on older
kernels. So I'm not sure whether it will need a feature bit or
not yet.

The test matrix of having to test everything on v4 and v5 is just
nasty, especially if we are talking about prototyping code. I'd much
prefer to bring things to v5 filesytsems where we have much lower
exposure and risk of corruption problems, and then when we know it's
solid because of the QA we've done on it, then we can expose the
majority of the XFS userbase to it by bringing it back to v4
filesystems.

As i've said before - if someone wants to bring new features to v4
filesystems sooner than I do, then they need to step up and do the
work themselves, because I don't have the time and resources to
fully verify new features on v4 filesystem formats...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-09 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-09  8:34 [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: increase inode cluster size for v5 filesystems Dave Chinner
2013-09-09 13:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-09-09 13:54   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-09-09 15:35   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-09-11 16:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-09-17  1:04       ` Dave Chinner
2013-09-17 13:51         ` Mark Tinguely
2013-09-17 21:25           ` Dave Chinner
2013-09-17 14:46         ` Eric Sandeen
2013-09-17 21:11           ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130909153546.GT12779@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox