From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [deadlock] AGI vs AGF ordering deadlocks
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:36:29 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130910073629.GA19103@dastard> (raw)
FOlks,
I just got confirmation of a deadlock I suspected has existed for
some time. A concurrent 16-way create and 16-way unlink just locked
up with two threads looking like this:
fs_mark D ffff88021bd931c0 3656 7204 7117 0x00000000
ffff8801e75293a8 0000000000000086 ffff88012c6d0000 ffff8801e7529fd8
ffff8801e7529fd8 ffff8801e7529fd8 ffff8802d32aae40 ffff88012c6d0000
ffff8801a2f79d40 7fffffffffffffff ffff8801ee733bb0 0000000000000002
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff819b0d19>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[<ffffffff819acd09>] schedule_timeout+0x149/0x1f0
[<ffffffff819af6bc>] __down_common+0x91/0xe8
[<ffffffff819af786>] __down+0x1d/0x1f
[<ffffffff810b5211>] down+0x41/0x50
[<ffffffff81423dd0>] xfs_buf_lock+0x40/0xf0
[<ffffffff81424051>] _xfs_buf_find+0x1d1/0x4d0
[<ffffffff814244f5>] xfs_buf_get_map+0x35/0x180
[<ffffffff81425517>] xfs_buf_read_map+0x37/0x110
[<ffffffff8149e299>] xfs_trans_read_buf_map+0x379/0x600
[<ffffffff81444178>] xfs_read_agf+0xa8/0x100
[<ffffffff8144423a>] xfs_alloc_read_agf+0x6a/0x250
[<ffffffff81444950>] xfs_alloc_fix_freelist+0x4f0/0x5a0
[<ffffffff81444e40>] xfs_alloc_vextent+0x440/0x840
[<ffffffff8147d0cf>] xfs_ialloc_ag_alloc+0x13f/0x520
[<ffffffff8147e871>] xfs_dialloc+0x121/0x2d0
[<ffffffff814803db>] xfs_ialloc+0x5b/0x7c0
[<ffffffff81480bda>] xfs_dir_ialloc+0x9a/0x2f0
[<ffffffff8148134d>] xfs_create+0x47d/0x6a0
[<ffffffff814343ea>] xfs_vn_mknod+0xba/0x1c0
[<ffffffff81434523>] xfs_vn_create+0x13/0x20
[<ffffffff811a62a5>] vfs_create+0xb5/0xf0
[<ffffffff811a6a40>] do_last.isra.56+0x760/0xd10
[<ffffffff811a70ae>] path_openat+0xbe/0x620
[<ffffffff811a7bc3>] do_filp_open+0x43/0xa0
[<ffffffff811969cc>] do_sys_open+0x13c/0x230
[<ffffffff81196ae2>] SyS_open+0x22/0x30
[<ffffffff819bae19>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
That a thread holding an AGI and blocking trying to get the AGF to
do an inode chunk allocation.
rm D ffff88021bd931c0 3048 7073 7063 0x00000000
ffff8802bc66d998 0000000000000086 ffff8802d32aae40 ffff8802bc66dfd8
ffff8802bc66dfd8 ffff8802bc66dfd8 ffff88012c6d5c80 ffff8802d32aae40
ffff8804091b2b00 7fffffffffffffff ffff8801b943c570 0000000000000002
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff819b0d19>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[<ffffffff819acd09>] schedule_timeout+0x149/0x1f0
[<ffffffff819af6bc>] __down_common+0x91/0xe8
[<ffffffff819af786>] __down+0x1d/0x1f
[<ffffffff810b5211>] down+0x41/0x50
[<ffffffff81423dd0>] xfs_buf_lock+0x40/0xf0
[<ffffffff81424051>] _xfs_buf_find+0x1d1/0x4d0
[<ffffffff814244f5>] xfs_buf_get_map+0x35/0x180
[<ffffffff81425517>] xfs_buf_read_map+0x37/0x110
[<ffffffff8149e299>] xfs_trans_read_buf_map+0x379/0x600
[<ffffffff8147d8ca>] xfs_read_agi+0xaa/0x100
[<ffffffff81481f4e>] xfs_iunlink+0x8e/0x260
[<ffffffff81482198>] xfs_droplink+0x78/0x80
[<ffffffff81483671>] xfs_remove+0x331/0x420
[<ffffffff814340f2>] xfs_vn_unlink+0x52/0xa0
[<ffffffff811a4f9e>] vfs_unlink+0x9e/0x110
[<ffffffff811a51b1>] do_unlinkat+0x1a1/0x230
[<ffffffff811a805b>] SyS_unlinkat+0x1b/0x40
And that's a thread that has just freed a directory block and so
holds an AGF lock, and is trying to take the AGI lock to add the
inode to the unlinked list. Everything else is now stuck waiting
for log space because one of the two buffers we've deadlocked on
here pins the tail of the log.
The solution is to place the inode on the unlinked list before we
remove the directory entry so that we keep the same locking order as
inode allocation.
I don't have time to look at this for at least a week, so if someone
could work up solution that'd be wonderful...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-10 7:36 Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-09-10 7:58 ` [deadlock] AGI vs AGF ordering deadlocks Jeff Liu
2013-09-12 6:28 ` Jeff Liu
2013-09-12 13:46 ` Mark Tinguely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130910073629.GA19103@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox