From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED7F7F3F for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:44:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F76AC003 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:44:23 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568 Message-ID: <20130916154423.GA455@infradead.org> References: <52165830.8050006@redhat.com> <52325369.1070001@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52325369.1070001@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Tinguely Cc: Brian Foster , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 06:51:05PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > The secret to tripping over the bug is run the test until fsstress > fills the filesystem before removing the files. So an error > handling? > > I use the test: > > #!/bin/sh > > ltp/fsstress -z -s 1378390208 -fsymlink=1 -n9999999 -p4 -d /test2 > cd /test2 > sync > rm -rf * > > If your filesystem is smaller, decrease the -n to make the test faster. > > I have still not gotten a core, though Michael Semon sent one. It would be useful if we could wire this up for xfstests _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs