From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436AD7F3F for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:39:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2E78F8050 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9iTA55jO6ECZmTsP for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:39:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:38:55 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: xfsprogs: update version for 3.2.0-alpha1 Message-ID: <20130916223855.GF19103@dastard> References: <20130916205637.GD1935@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130916205637.GD1935@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: rjohnston@sgi.com, sandeen@sandeen.net, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 03:56:37PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > xfsprogs: update version for 3.2.0-alpha1 I'd say this is a major feature and infrastructure update across the entire xfsprogs package, and in that case a PKG_MAJOR bump is warranted, not PKG_MINOR. i.e. We're shooting for a 4.0 release, not 3.2... > > Update the VERSION and doc/CHANGES file for alpha release, 3.2.0-alpha1 > > Signed-off-by: Ben Myers > Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston > > --- > VERSION | 4 ++-- > configure.ac | 2 +- > doc/CHANGES | 4 ++++ > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Index: b/VERSION > =================================================================== > --- a/VERSION 2013-09-16 15:50:29.544368912 -0500 > +++ b/VERSION 2013-09-16 15:50:37.993732514 -0500 > @@ -2,6 +2,6 @@ > # This file is used by configure to get version information > # > PKG_MAJOR=3 > -PKG_MINOR=1 > -PKG_REVISION=11 > +PKG_MINOR=2 > +PKG_REVISION=0-alpha1 To make it easy for packaging, 3.99.0 would probably fit better with various distro package naming/numbering schemes... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs