From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA2629DFB for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 13:51:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C969304032 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id NLxd976hxmYqI6AY (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 11:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 11:51:04 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from stable rules Message-ID: <20130922185104.GA7515@infradead.org> References: <20130919.135628.1201613770803318193.davem@davemloft.net> <1379615474.22168.13.camel@joe-AO722> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1379615474.22168.13.camel@joe-AO722> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Joe Perches Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , xfs@oss.sgi.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, Mikulas Patocka , Rob Landley , Greg Kroah-Hartman , David Miller This is also the preferred way to do it for XFS. Maybe word it in a way that we can easily add subsystems. To me it generally seems to be the best way to do it - having random Ccs and lots of stable trees doesn't seem like a very good way of handling it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs