* Re: [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from stable rules [not found] ` <1379615474.22168.13.camel@joe-AO722> @ 2013-09-22 18:51 ` Christoph Hellwig 2013-09-23 20:34 ` Joe Perches 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2013-09-22 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches Cc: linux-doc, netdev, LKML, xfs, stephen, Mikulas Patocka, Rob Landley, Greg Kroah-Hartman, David Miller This is also the preferred way to do it for XFS. Maybe word it in a way that we can easily add subsystems. To me it generally seems to be the best way to do it - having random Ccs and lots of stable trees doesn't seem like a very good way of handling it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from stable rules 2013-09-22 18:51 ` [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from stable rules Christoph Hellwig @ 2013-09-23 20:34 ` Joe Perches 2013-09-24 8:48 ` Christoph Hellwig 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2013-09-23 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-doc, netdev, LKML, xfs, stephen, Mikulas Patocka, Rob Landley, Greg Kroah-Hartman, David Miller On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 11:51 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This is also the preferred way to do it for XFS. Maybe word it in a way > that we can easily add subsystems. > > To me it generally seems to be the best way to do it - having random Ccs > and lots of stable trees doesn't seem like a very good way of handling > it. Maybe adding a mechanism to MAINTAINERS would be better. Maybe a default B: (backport?) of stable@vger.kernel.org with a per-subsystem override? SUBSYSTEM TYPE M: maintainer@email.address L: list@email.address S: Supported F: file/pattern/ B: stable@email.address _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from stable rules 2013-09-23 20:34 ` Joe Perches @ 2013-09-24 8:48 ` Christoph Hellwig 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2013-09-24 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches Cc: stephen, linux-doc, Greg Kroah-Hartman, LKML, xfs, Christoph Hellwig, Mikulas Patocka, Rob Landley, netdev, David Miller On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 01:34:05PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Maybe adding a mechanism to MAINTAINERS would be better. > Maybe a default B: (backport?) of stable@vger.kernel.org > with a per-subsystem override? Sounds fine to me. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-24 8:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <alpine.LRH.2.02.1309191229480.32035@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20130919.135628.1201613770803318193.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.02.1309191359300.12162@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1379615474.22168.13.camel@joe-AO722>
2013-09-22 18:51 ` [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from stable rules Christoph Hellwig
2013-09-23 20:34 ` Joe Perches
2013-09-24 8:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox