public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: don't try to mark uncached buffers stale on error.
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:31:08 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130925003108.GF26872@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130924205949.GK1935@sgi.com>

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 03:59:49PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:32:32AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:33:24AM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > > ...but it looks like your fix is in xfs_bdstrat_cb, which wouldn't have been
> > > involved in the stack you posted above.  What am I missing?
> > 
> > That the first hunk that changes xfs_bioerror_relse() fixes the bug
> > that caused the assert failure through xfsbdstrat().
> 
> *blink*
> 
> All I see in that first hunk are changes to comments.  The second hunk seems to
> contain the only functional change, highlighted above.

You are right - it should not be reliably fixing the failure I'm
seeing. I'm sure there was something else in this patch originally -
I'll go back and check.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-25  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-24  6:01 [PATCH 0/5] xfs: fixes for 3.12-rc3 Dave Chinner
2013-09-24  6:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: don't try to mark uncached buffers stale on error Dave Chinner
2013-09-24 15:31   ` Mark Tinguely
2013-09-24 15:33   ` Ben Myers
2013-09-24 20:32     ` Dave Chinner
2013-09-24 20:59       ` Ben Myers
2013-09-25  0:31         ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-09-24  6:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: lock the AIL before removing the buffer item Dave Chinner
2013-09-24 16:12   ` Mark Tinguely
2013-09-24  6:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: asserting lock not held during freeing not valid Dave Chinner
2013-09-24 17:17   ` Mark Tinguely
2013-09-24  6:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: fix XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS definition Dave Chinner
2013-09-24 16:13   ` Mark Tinguely
2013-09-24  6:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: log recovery lsn ordering needs uuid check Dave Chinner
2013-09-24 17:14   ` Ben Myers
2013-09-24 17:46 ` [PATCH 0/5] xfs: fixes for 3.12-rc3 Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130925003108.GF26872@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox