From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F7229DFC for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:52:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C9A304053 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CRUutIoHJ4nt89FU (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:52:18 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] xfs: unify directory/attribute format definitions Message-ID: <20131003145218.GB10316@infradead.org> References: <1380510433-8353-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1380510433-8353-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1380510433-8353-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Looks good, but you have some function prototype declarations sneaking into the format header again. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs