From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C11129DFC for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:58:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150C7304059 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6VCJfULYrDIYwFvB (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:58:49 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] xfs: decouple inode and bmap btree header files Message-ID: <20131003145849.GE10316@infradead.org> References: <1380510433-8353-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1380510433-8353-6-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1380510433-8353-6-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com I like this a lot, but it also seems to move the in-core btree records and keys to the format header which seems wrong. Maybe those should be centralized in xfs_btree.h instead? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs