From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433CC7FB3 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 19:25:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 19:25:33 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] xfs: rework xfs_inactive() Message-ID: <20131009002533.GZ1935@sgi.com> References: <1379689572-5543-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1379689572-5543-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brian Foster Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:06:08AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > Hi all, > > This set reworks the xfs_inactive() path with the intent to clean up the > transaction management overall. This is preparation work for the free > inode btree set and subsequent work in the area. The patches clean up > the remote symlink work, truncate work and ifree work respectively. > > This passes through a quick xfstests run (with debug and lockdep) > without any major explosions. Thoughts appreciated. > > Brian Applied these four. Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs