From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224727F6A for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:43:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1608F8074 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:43:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PuxGED1rsvEKlHCN for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 13:43:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 07:43:25 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/32] xfs: fix some minor sparse warnings Message-ID: <20131009204325.GI4446@dastard> References: <1380510944-8571-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1380510944-8571-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <52548D80.8070807@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52548D80.8070807@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 05:56:00PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 9/29/13 10:15 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > From: Dave Chinner > > > > A couple of simple locking annotations and 0 vs NULL warnings. > > Nothing that changes any code behaviour, just removes build noise. > > The patch is fine as it is, but it doesn't reflect the commit log. > > Is part of it missing? It's trimmed down from the kernel commit to just the bits that are in libxfs. I haven't altered it in any other way, so it's entirely possible the commit message has bits in it that the patch now doesn't. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs