From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8104F7F7C for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:41:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FA7AC004 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id mSTIymIpMHROoeS5 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:41:15 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: mkfs scratch device in generic/294 Message-ID: <20131009214115.GL4446@dastard> References: <5251CB37.2040406@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5251CB37.2040406@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 03:42:31PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > test 294 is using the scratch device w/o mkfs-ing it first, > this runs the risk of following a test which completely > fills the fs, causing 294 to fail. > > add "rm -f $seqres.full" as well, it was growing on every run. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen *nod* Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs