From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888867F5E for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:46:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E67304043 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:46:09 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: projid32bit=1 default in xfsprogs-3.2.0 Message-ID: <20131015194609.GC32095@infradead.org> References: <525C1C15.7020204@sandeen.net> <20131014211659.GI5663@dastard> <20131014212347.GB1935@sgi.com> <525C6108.6010108@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <525C6108.6010108@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Ben Myers , xfs-oss On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 04:24:24PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Ok. Default it is! Thanks guys, just wanted to make sure we were > all in agreement there. Can we make sure this gets documented in doc/CHANGES? I'm also pretty sure the entry for 3.2.0-alpha1 is severly lacking, can we make sure the one for the real release is as detailed as the ones for the previous releases? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs