From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068607F3F for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:52:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6EB304048 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id fv9JpmHhF3MEV3KE for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 08:51:53 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add specific test for default ACL inheritance Message-ID: <20131016215153.GK4446@dastard> References: <1381932296-14674-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@gmail.com> <525EAC5F.3040201@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <525EAC5F.3040201@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Filipe David Borba Manana , jbacik@fusionio.com, dsterba@suse.cz On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:10:23AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 10/16/13 9:04 AM, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote: > > This test is motivated by an issue found by a btrfs user, addressed > > and described by the following GNU/Linux kernel patch: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3046931/ > > Hi Filipe, thanks for the patch. > > Usually we don't want to add new, possibly-failing cases to old tests; > that makes it harder to identify when the code regressed vs. when > the test changed to test new things. > > It would be better to just copy the framework of tests/shared/051 > to a new test in shared/ and test only this new inheritance > problem. > > Also, I'm confused about this hunk: > > > @@ -345,7 +345,12 @@ chacl $acl2 largeaclfile > > getfacl --numeric largeaclfile | _filter_aces > > > > echo "1 above xfs acl max" > > -chacl $acl3 largeaclfile > > +if [ "$FSTYP" != "btrfs" ]; then > > + chacl $acl3 largeaclfile > > +else > > + echo 'chacl: cannot set access acl on "largeaclfile": Invalid argument' > > +fi > > + > > getfacl --numeric largeaclfile | _filter_aces > > > > echo "use 16 aces" > > What's that about? That's working around the "XFS only supports 25 ACLs test". Another reason for making this a separate, generic test. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs