public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: remove the unused XFS_ATTR_NONBLOCK flag
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:03:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131017200315.GA26616@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131017200109.GI1935@sgi.com>

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 03:01:09PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> An xfs ioctl user who requests nonblocking behavior will no longer get it.
> This seems to constitute API breakage.  How can we verify that this is unused
> since anyone can open with O_NONBLOCK?

The flag isn't checked anywhere, which means it doesn't have any effect,
and doesn't as far as I can look back.  I also don't know how the
prealloc ioctls could behave non-blocking in any sane way.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-17 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-12  7:55 [PATCH 0/5] refactor the preallocation and hole punching code Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-12  7:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: always take the iolock around xfs_setattr_size Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-14  4:50   ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-14  7:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-14 14:09   ` [PATCH 1/5 v3] " Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-14 20:28     ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-12  7:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: remove the unused XFS_ATTR_NONBLOCK flag Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-14  4:51   ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-17 20:01     ` Ben Myers
2013-10-17 20:03       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2013-10-17 21:17         ` Ben Myers
2013-10-12  7:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: always hold the iolock when calling xfs_change_file_space Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-14  4:55   ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-12  7:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: simplify the fallocate path Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-14  5:04   ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-14  7:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-14 20:03       ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-12  7:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: fold xfs_change_file_space into xfs_ioc_space Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-14  5:08   ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-15 15:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-15 21:47       ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-16  7:03         ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-21 21:58 ` [PATCH 0/5] refactor the preallocation and hole punching code Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131017200315.GA26616@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox