From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1B17F37 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:42:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662A9AC005 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:42:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CRoCZjrqtuW04GgY (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:42:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:42:20 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: prevent stack overflows from page cache allocation Message-ID: <20131024154220.GA19055@infradead.org> References: <1382585110-1796-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20131024084803.GA28144@infradead.org> <20131024103751.GS2797@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131024103751.GS2797@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:37:51PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Sure, if you want to. But doing that shouldn't prevent this fix from > being committed in the mean time, especially as other filesystems > already use this method for avoiding these problems. I'd much prefer aiming for the proper fix first. If for some reason we can't get it done in time the workaround can be applied. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs