Re: [PATCH 19/19] xfs: convert directory vector functions to constants

Dave Chinner
2013-10-16T22:23:36Z

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:16:15PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:18:05AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> >
> > Many of the vectorised function calls now take no parameters and
> > return a constant value. There is no reason for these to be vectored
> > functions, so convert them to constants
> >
> > Binary sizes:
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 794490 96802 1096 892388 d9de4 fs/xfs/xfs.o.orig
> > 792986 96802 1096 890884 d9804 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p1
> > 792350 96802 1096 890248 d9588 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p2
> > 789293 96802 1096 887191 d8997 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p3
> > 789005 96802 1096 886903 d8997 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p4
> > 789061 96802 1096 886959 d88af fs/xfs/xfs.o.p5
> > 789733 96802 1096 887631 d8b4f fs/xfs/xfs.o.p6
> > 791421 96802 1096 889319 d91e7 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p7
> > 791701 96802 1096 889599 d92ff fs/xfs/xfs.o.p8
> > 791205 96802 1096 889103 d91cf fs/xfs/xfs.o.p9
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Hmmm. This one doesn't seem to apply. Maybe it's just me.

Applies without mismatch here on an 3.12-rc5 + oss-xfs/master tree
here. What's the reject that you get?

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com