public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/19] xfs: vectorise directory data operations
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:28:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131024222811.GA10553@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131024220844.GY2797@dastard>

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 09:08:44AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 04:41:12PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:31:17AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:39:09PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:17:59AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Following from the initial patches to vectorise the shortform
> > > > > directory encode/decode operations, convert half the data block
> > > > > operations to use the vector. The rest will be done in a second
> > > > > patch.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This further reduces the size of the built binary:
> > > > > 
> > > > >    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> > > > >  794490   96802    1096  892388   d9de4 fs/xfs/xfs.o.orig
> > > > >  792986   96802    1096  890884   d9804 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p1
> > > > >  792350   96802    1096  890248   d9588 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p2
> > > > >  789293   96802    1096  887191   d8997 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p3
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > > 
> > > > Generally looks pretty good, I have a question below...
> > > > 
> > > > >  const struct xfs_dir_ops xfs_dir2_ftype_ops = {
> > > > > @@ -223,6 +415,18 @@ const struct xfs_dir_ops xfs_dir2_ftype_ops = {
> > > > >  	.sf_put_ino = xfs_dir3_sfe_put_ino,
> > > > >  	.sf_get_parent_ino = xfs_dir2_sf_get_parent_ino,
> > > > >  	.sf_put_parent_ino = xfs_dir2_sf_put_parent_ino,
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	.data_entsize = xfs_dir3_data_entsize,
> > > > > +	.data_get_ftype = xfs_dir3_data_get_ftype,
> > > > > +	.data_put_ftype = xfs_dir3_data_put_ftype,
> > > > > +	.data_entry_tag_p = xfs_dir3_data_entry_tag_p,
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	.data_dot_offset = xfs_dir2_data_dot_offset,
> > > > > +	.data_dotdot_offset = xfs_dir2_data_dotdot_offset,
> > > > > +	.data_first_offset = xfs_dir2_data_first_offset,
> > > > > +	.data_dot_entry_p = xfs_dir2_data_dot_entry_p,
> > > > > +	.data_dotdot_entry_p = xfs_dir2_data_dotdot_entry_p,
> > > > > +	.data_first_entry_p = xfs_dir2_data_first_entry_p,
> > > > >  };
> > > > 
> > > > I think there may be a problem here.  Although the dirv2 functions for
> > > > ., .., and first entry offset account for the v2 header size, they
> > > > appear not to be accounting for the modified entry size due to the file
> > > > type field.  Am I missing something?
> > > 
> > > The ftype field is handled by the alignment roundup. i.e. namelen is
> > > 1 or two bytes, plus ftype is 2 or 3 bytes, roundup is to 8 bytes.
> > > Hence adding a byte for the ftype field is not a problem for these
> > > first entries because of their small, fixed size.
> 
> I should point out that this code is functionally identical to the
> way the original macros treated the v4 ftype code. You reviewed that
> code and tested it and it as such this implicit use of padding was
> considered perfectly OK just a couple of months ago.....

It is a detail that I overlooked.  I try to do a thorough review... but
sometimes things don't register.

> > It should either be explicitly correct (and I think it is today), or we
> > need a comment to explain why it's not.  I would prefer the former.
> 
> Well, I'll add a patch at the end of the series to change it. I don't want to
> have to rebase the rest of the patches in the series just because of the
> don't apply because of context mismatches.

Sounds great.

> 
> Besides, the last patch in the series it replaces the offset functions with
> precalculated values. That replacement fixes the offset calculation to
> explicitly use dir2 hdrs and dir3 entsizes, so the problem goes away for
> those entries.

Ok, I'll look out for it then.

Thanks,
	Ben

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-24 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-14 22:17 [PATCH 00/19 V2] xfs: patches for 3.13 Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 01/19] xfs: xfs_remove deadlocks due to inverted AGF vs AGI lock ordering Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 02/19] xfs: open code inc_inode_iversion when logging an inode Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 03/19] xfs: prevent deadlock trying to cover an active log Dave Chinner
2013-10-17 15:54   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-17 18:51     ` Ben Myers
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 04/19] xfs: create a shared header file for format-related information Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 23:12   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-22 23:36     ` [PATCH 04/19, V2] " Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 05/19] xfs: unify directory/attribute format definitions Dave Chinner
2013-10-21 23:11   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-21 23:33     ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 14:57       ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 06/19] xfs: split dquot buffer operations out Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 07/19] xfs: remove unused transaction callback variables Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 14:25   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 08/19] xfs: decouple log and transaction headers Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 17:16   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-22 23:50     ` [PATCH 08/19, V2] " Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 09/19] xfs: decouple inode and bmap btree header files Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 18:29   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-22 23:40     ` [PATCH 09/19, V2] " Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 23:48       ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-22 23:51     ` [PATCH 09/19, V3] " Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 10/19] xfs: split xfs_rtalloc.c for userspace sanity Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 11/19] xfs: abstract the differences in dir2/dir3 via an ops vector Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 12/19] xfs: vectorise remaining shortform dir2 ops Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:17 ` [PATCH 13/19] xfs: vectorise directory data operations Dave Chinner
2013-10-24 18:39   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-24 21:31     ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-24 21:41       ` Ben Myers
2013-10-24 22:08         ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-24 22:28           ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-10-27 23:01             ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:18 ` [PATCH 14/19] xfs: vectorise directory data operations part 2 Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:18 ` [PATCH 15/19] xfs: vectorise directory leaf operations Dave Chinner
2013-10-20 23:25   ` [PATCH 15/19, V2] " Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 22:18 ` [PATCH 16/19] xfs: vectorise DA btree operations Dave Chinner
2013-10-25 17:17   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-14 22:18 ` [PATCH 17/19] xfs: vectorise encoding/decoding directory headers Dave Chinner
2013-10-25 18:46   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-25 19:20     ` Ben Myers
2013-10-14 22:18 ` [PATCH 18/19] xfs: vectorise directory leaf operations Dave Chinner
2013-10-25 20:18   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-25 21:51   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-14 22:18 ` [PATCH 19/19] xfs: convert directory vector functions to constants Dave Chinner
2013-10-16 21:16   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-16 22:23     ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-16 22:52       ` Ben Myers
2013-10-16 23:06         ` Ben Myers
2013-10-17  0:17           ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-23 22:23             ` Ben Myers
2013-10-25 21:47   ` Ben Myers
2013-10-23 22:23 ` [PATCH 00/19 V2] xfs: patches for 3.13 Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131024222811.GA10553@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox