From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2AD7F54 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 06:15:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD39AC001 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id oBenuQGPri4SScB1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 04:15:29 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix _filter_ro_mount and make xfs/200 pass with old mount Message-ID: <20131031111529.GA24560@infradead.org> References: <1383216916-2211-1-git-send-email-eguan@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1383216916-2211-1-git-send-email-eguan@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eryu Guan Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 06:55:16PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > We just want to remove "block device" in _filter_ro_mount(), so add > "mount:" back. > > Add one more call of _filter_ro_mount() in xfs/200 to match 200.out. Thanks, I've seen this issue too but didn't have time to debug it yet. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs