From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390B97FAF for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:40:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A58AC004 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id uT58zcgRyZhJ7LtY (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:40:30 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: generic/317 use relative paths to avoid traversal permission problems Message-ID: <20131031154030.GA6065@infradead.org> References: <20131024161235.GA29381@infradead.org> <20131024162557.6dd72435@oracle.com> <20131025093333.GB24583@infradead.org> <20131028114328.4b05e0ee@oracle.com> <20131030161955.GA28755@infradead.org> <20131030162441.GA1112@infradead.org> <20131030143050.34a3b120@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131030143050.34a3b120@oracle.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dwight Engen Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:30:50PM -0400, Dwight Engen wrote: > Yep, that makes sense. I modeled this on 219 which was using > $here/src/lstat64 but didn't think about the fact that in my test fsgqa > might have traversal problems. I see plenty of other tests are using > relative paths so the following patch should (hopefully) fix 317 for you. > Thanks for tracking it down. Thanks, this fixes the problem for me. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs