From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844987F93 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:18:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A468F8052 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 16:18:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id U6gemV7RAm20NfTL for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:18:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:18:07 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/30] db: verify and calculate inode CRCs Message-ID: <20131105001807.GT6188@dastard> References: <1383107481-28937-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1383107481-28937-21-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20131104090551.GA23564@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131104090551.GA23564@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:05:51AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > +#define libxfs_dinode_verify xfs_dinode_verify > > Is there really any point in adding this libxfs renaming in new code? Just following the convention used by all the other code... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs