From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC677FF0 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 02:17:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BFBAC006 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:17:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:17:10 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfstest failures Message-ID: <20131107081710.GC25157@infradead.org> References: <20131106105451.GA31283@infradead.org> <20131106161825.GU1935@sgi.com> <527A887F.2030807@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <527A887F.2030807@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Ben Myers , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:20:47PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > that's right, it's a known bug w/ a testcase but no fix yet. > > I looked a bit, but ugh, xfsdump. Maybe it's time you come up with an xfail mechanism at least? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs