From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFA029E04 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 06:02:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55034304053 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 04:01:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 8kq6WukqO4ejq4Bl (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 04:01:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 04:01:57 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfstest failures Message-ID: <20131107120157.GA4683@infradead.org> References: <20131106105451.GA31283@infradead.org> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <20131107082234.GA30243@infradead.org> <20131107115722.GB11434@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131107115722.GB11434@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:57:22PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Actually, it doesn't. v4 configs give the same notrun output, which > is wrong but doesn't result in a failure (hence I didn't notice it). > Now that you've reported it I've just found a bug in the > _requires_attr_v1 function that makes it always fail and notrun the > test.... It fails for me running latests xfstests, latest xfsprogs an latest xfs tree in a x86 VM running the default mkfs options. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs