From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122687FF2 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:00:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE71530406B for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 06:00:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 06:00:04 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfstest failures Message-ID: <20131107140004.GA9489@infradead.org> References: <20131106105451.GA31283@infradead.org> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <527A9F67.6000208@sgi.com> <20131107081634.GB25157@infradead.org> <527B94A5.20004@sgi.com> <527B9C80.4060304@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <527B9C80.4060304@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Mark Tinguely , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:58:24AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > We had a really high rate of change there for a while, and keeping up on > all fronts was tough. > > There's been a bit of defensiveness in the replies here; let's get past > that & take Christoph's list of failures and just get them taken care of. > > I'll try to go through the failures and either pick up existing patches, > or get new ones written, and get a new series on the list to get this all > cleaned up. It also would be use if everyone could resend patches more than say 2 weeks old that haven't moved forward or outright rejected. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs