From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132427FEF for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:49:05 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:49:01 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: xfstest failures Message-ID: <20131107204901.GL10553@sgi.com> References: <20131106105451.GA31283@infradead.org> <20131106161825.GU1935@sgi.com> <527A887F.2030807@sandeen.net> <20131107081710.GC25157@infradead.org> <527B948C.9060905@sandeen.net> <20131107132739.GA16608@infradead.org> <527B99C3.6090903@sandeen.net> <20131107134848.GA1163@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131107134848.GA1163@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 05:48:48AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:46:43AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Would an expected failure be only for tests which are known to be > > not-fixed anywhere? > > > Exactly. If you want to be fancy we could allow a drop-in file to > override it if you want something for RHEL testing or similar Good idea to have an override, since everybody has multiple flavors to test which all have different sets of tests that fail. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs