Re: xfs: update maintainers file

Zhi Yong Wu
2013-11-08T02:30:58Z

+1,

We should take the contribution of some core developers and their
willingness into account, not only the benefit of some company.

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> How exactly did we decide to add a new co-maintainer? Shouldn't we have some
> discussion on the list and see some substantial history of contributions?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ric
>
>
>
> On 11/07/2013 05:08 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>>
>> Updated maintainer info.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Index: b/MAINTAINERS
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS 2013-11-07 15:42:04.554561805 -0600
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS 2013-11-07 15:42:59.034889770 -0600
>> @@ -9388,7 +9388,7 @@ F: drivers/xen/*swiotlb*
>> XFS FILESYSTEM
>> P: Silicon Graphics Inc
>> M: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
>> -M: Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>
>> +M: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
>> M: xfs@oss.sgi.com
>> L: xfs@oss.sgi.com
>> W: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xfs mailing list
>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

--
Regards,

Zhi Yong Wu