From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B037F90 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:38:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44A28F8049 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:38:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ETNiwm2PCLHU6Yd3 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:38:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:38:30 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: remove xfs_check references from fsck.xfs script & manpage Message-ID: <20131112173830.GF19554@infradead.org> References: <528257D0.7050404@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <528257D0.7050404@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:12AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > xfs_check is deprecated & slated for removal in June 2014. > > We can stop referring to it now, though - pointing fsck.xfs > users to it doesn't make sense at this point. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs