From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867837F52 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:09:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638E3304048 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:09:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9R0rNbEUCSea3olI for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:09:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:09:04 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: correct docs for "-t" units Message-ID: <20131114220904.GR6188@dastard> References: <528534B0.8070709@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <528534B0.8070709@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:38:08PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > usage() says that the xfs_repair -t reporting interval is > in minutes, and the manpage says nothing at all about units. > > Actually, it's in seconds. > > Clarify in both places that the interval is specified in > seconds. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen > --- Looks good. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs