From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821887F4E for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 04:06:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2DA8F8054 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 02:06:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id qw4OxVXCTnKOVczQ (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 02:06:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 02:06:45 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs_fsr: extra debugging info Message-ID: <20131117100645.GA31408@infradead.org> References: <5261B11F.1040000@redhat.com> <5261B183.7040309@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5261B183.7040309@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 05:09:07PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Provide 2 new pieces of information when -d is specified to > xfs_fsr: > > * If we needed to grow the forkoffset and couldn't > * If we were unable to match the fork offset > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs