From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2467F50 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:35:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CEB304070 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:35:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id njSaxqyFa9E13dJM (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:35:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:35:15 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: generic/285: use the canonical device name Message-ID: <20131122153515.GA15143@infradead.org> References: <1385115783-9409-1-git-send-email-stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1385115783-9409-1-git-send-email-stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stanislav Kholmanskikh Cc: vasily.isaenko@oracle.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:23:03PM +0400, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote: > In order to access something under /sys/fs/ext4 we > need to be sure that the device name is canonical > (It matters, for example, if we use LVM). Did you try just using the canonical name all through xfstests, that is canonicalise it after reading the config? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs