From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227067F57 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:36:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDBCAC003 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:36:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from boogeyman.armory.com (adsl-76-230-21-225.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [76.230.21.225]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id fotkCW5HEodeS2D9 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:36:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:36:43 -0800 From: Phil White Subject: Re: Problem with mkfs.xfs on a regular file Message-ID: <20131127023643.GC13101@boogeyman> References: <20131127023119.GB13101@boogeyman> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131127023119.GB13101@boogeyman> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 06:31:19PM -0800, Phil White wrote: > Gents: > > I was making an image for a VM using everyone's favorite fs with a line > that looked something like this: > ------------- > dd if=/dev/zero of=~/image bs=1024 count=1048576 && ./mkfs/mkfs.xfs && mount -o loop ~/image /mnt/loop > ------------- Obviously, I intended "mkfs.xfs -f /root/image". Why is proofreading *AFTER* you send an email so much more effective? -Phil _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs